Investor Alert

New York Markets Open in:

Mark Hulbert

Mark Hulbert Archives | Email alerts

Aug. 6, 2022, 9:08 a.m. EDT

Gloomy ISM readings are a good predictor of company earnings — but not of what the stock market will do

Watchlist Relevance

Want to see how this story relates to your watchlist?

Just add items to create a watchlist now:

  • X
    S&P 500 Index (SPX)

or Cancel Already have a watchlist? Log In

By Mark Hulbert

I’m not saying the bear market is over. But if U.S. stocks continue to slide, don’t blame the ISM’s recent decline.

The Institute for Supply Management’s manufacturing index — the ISM Index — is otherwise known as the manufacturing purchasing managers index, or PMI. The ISM reflects the results of a monthly survey of purchasing managers at hundreds of U.S. manufacturing firms.

Economic calendar: Nonfarm payrolls and unemployment data due Friday, along with a consumer-credit update and more

This key indicator of economic health is currently at 52.8 — down from as high as 63.7 in early 2021, and at its lowest level since the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. As my MarketWatch colleague Jeffry Bartash reported , this latest reading is “a sign of creeping weakness in the U.S. economy.”

Many bears have pounced on this latest reading as a reason to expect further weakness in coming months. They point out, with substantial historical supporting evidence, that corporate earnings tend to follow the lead of the ISM index with a several month time lag.

But that most definitely does not mean equities will follow. The stock market’s current level already incorporates the bad earnings significance of the ISM’s latest report. The bears’ argument would be justified only if they could show that the market systematically ignores or misinterprets that significance.

Yet there is no such evidence. Consider what I found upon measuring the correlation between the ISM index and the S&P 500 Index /zigman2/quotes/210599714/realtime SPX +0.40% . When focusing on contemporaneous changes in these two indices, I found a significant positive correlation coefficient — 51.3% when correlating trailing 12-month percentage changes since 1948, as you can see from the chart below. This is exactly what you’d expect from an efficient stock market, rising and falling in synch with measures of economic activity.

In contrast, when correlating the ISM’s trailing 12-month percentage change with the S&P 500’s percentage change over the subsequent 12 months, the correlation coefficient turned negative — minus 12.4%, to be exact. This inverse correlation means that more often than not, the stock market turns in above-average performance following big drops in the ISM index — and vice versa.

To be sure, this inverse correlation is only marginally statistically significant. So it would be going too far to conclude that the ISM’s recent plunge is actually good news for the stock market. But the fact that it is even inverse at all shows that the stock market more or less immediately incorporates the full economic significance of new ISM readings and, if anything, slightly overreacts.

No one is arguing that the U.S. economy isn’t weaker than it was in 2021. It undeniably is. But that weakness is already incorporated in stock prices. The future course of the stock market will be a function of whether the economy in coming months is stronger or weaker than currently anticipated.

 Mark Hulbert is a regular contributor to MarketWatch. His Hulbert Ratings tracks investment newsletters that pay a flat fee to be audited. He can be reached at

Hear from Ray Dalio at the Best New Ideas in Money Festival on Sept. 21 and Sept. 22 in New York. The hedge-fund pioneer has strong views on where the economy is headed.

More: Most U.S. businesses grow faster in July, ISM finds, in sign of resilient economy

Also read: FAANGs ain’t what they used to be, so beware the bear-market bounce says this hedge fund manager

+17.38 +0.40%
Volume: 0.00
Sept. 25, 2023 5:22p

This Story has 0 Comments
Be the first to comment
More News In
Economy & Politics

Story Conversation

Commenting FAQs »

Partner Center

About Mark Hulbert

RSS News feed

Mark Hulbert is editor of the Hulbert Financial Digest, which since 1980 has been tracking the performance of hundreds of investment advisors. The HFD...

Mark Hulbert is editor of the Hulbert Financial Digest, which since 1980 has been tracking the performance of hundreds of investment advisors. The HFD became a service of MarketWatch in April 2002. In addition to being a Senior Columnist for MarketWatch, Hulbert writes a monthly column for Barron’s.com and a column on investment strategies for the Journal of the American Association of Individual Investors. A frequent guest on television and radio shows, you may have seen Hulbert on CNBC, Wall Street Week, or ABC’s World News This Morning. Most recently, Dow Jones and MarketWatch launched a new weekly newsletter based on Hulbert's research, entitled Hulbert on Markets: What’s Working Now.

More from Mark Hulbert

  1. Volatility knocks: Here’s how you can use the VIX to beat the stock market
  2. What a government shutdown would do to Social Security payments — and what you really should be worried about
  3. The S&P 500 is still overvalued — even with the correction. Here’s why.
  4. Why a Wall Street stock downgrade means more for your money than an upgrade
  5. The U.S. could be in a recession and we just don’t know it yet
Link to MarketWatch's Slice.