Investor Alert
Mark Hulbert

Mark Hulbert Archives | Email alerts

Oct. 24, 2020, 8:23 a.m. EDT

Only two other times since George Washington was president has the U.S. stock market been as far above trend as it is now

The internet bubble in 2000, the 1973-74 bear market — and the current market — are alarming outliers in the U.S. market’s 227-year history

Watchlist Relevance

Want to see how this story relates to your watchlist?

Just add items to create a watchlist now:

  • X
    S&P 500 Index (SPX)
  • X
    NASDAQ Composite Index (COMP)

or Cancel Already have a watchlist? Log In

By Mark Hulbert, MarketWatch

Getty Images

Here’s some disturbing news for those of you who think you’re basing your investment strategy on history: The U.S. stock market must fall 43% in order to be in line with the longest-possible trend in its history.

This trend to which I refer traces the U.S. stock market back to 1793. The data, adjusted for both dividends and inflation, are plotted in the chart below. The source is Edward McQuarrie, a professor emeritus at the Leavey School of Business at Santa Clara [Calif.] University who has spent years reconstructing U.S. stock market history.

The chart also shows the exponential trendline, which is the line that most closely fits the data on a logarithmic scale. (Such a scale is one in which the same vertical distance always represents the same percentage change.) As you can see, there have been a number of times over the past 227 years in which the stock market was well below trend — each of which represented highly opportune occasions in which to establish long-term equity positions.

Now is definitely not one of those times. In fact, as the chart shows, there have been only two other occasions when the U.S. stock market was as far above trend as it is now: the late 1960s/early 1970s and at the top of the internet bubble. We all know what happened after those two periods. The internet bubble burst, taking stocks with it, and the stock market from the bear-market of 1973-74 went nowhere on a dividend-adjusted and inflation-adjusted basis through 1985.

Respect the history

Is something equally traumatic guaranteed to be in our immediate future? Of course not. Nothing in the stock market is assured. But keep this long-term perspective in mind the next time your hear market analysis based on the “long term.” Chances are the focus is a lot shorter than 227 years, which in turn means that there is a distinct possibility that — either wittingly or unwittingly — the data involved will support a pre-determined conclusion.

To illustrate these cherry-picking possibilities, consider the contrasting conclusions you can reach depending on the length of the trendline you draw:

You could draw your trendline to extend back to the early 1920s. Relative to it, the current stock market is 9% below trend. Or you could decide to draw the trendline back to 1965. If you did that, you’d discover that the stock market would have to fall 37% in order to return to the trend.

To add to the complexities, you also could draw a trendline without adjusting for dividends or inflation. You could focus on different stock market benchmarks that reflect narrower swaths of the market than does McQuarrie’s database.

Nevertheless, you should know that many of these alternate ways of drawing trendlines also lead to conclusions that are just as bearish, if not more so, as focusing on the trend back to 1793. For example, Jill Mislinski of Advisor Perspectives recently calculated the S&P 500’s /zigman2/quotes/210599714/realtime SPX +0.18%  trend back to 1871 on an inflation-adjusted basis but not including dividends. “If the current S&P 500 were sitting squarely on the regression, it would be at the 1451 level” at the end of September — or 57% lower than it actually closed at the end of that month.

What about the Nasdaq Composite /zigman2/quotes/210598365/realtime COMP +0.74%  ? That index was created in 1971, so less data are available for it. But it’s more than 30% higher than a trendline drawn back to then.

These myriad possibilities can be confusing. But they serve to remind us that there are many judgment calls to be made when reading the historical tea leaves. So when you hear a conclusion about stocks over the long-term based on anything less than the full 227-year timeline of the U.S. stock market, ask what the result would be if that entire history was counted.

Mark Hulbert is a regular contributor to MarketWatch. His Hulbert Ratings tracks investment newsletters that pay a flat fee to be audited. He can be reached at

Read: Many stock investors are too young to remember Black Monday in October 1987 — why that’s a problem

More: ‘Warning sign’: Dow industrials lag behind as transports keep making new highs

+7.71 +0.18%
Volume: 1.85B
June 14, 2021 5:15p
US : Nasdaq
+104.72 +0.74%
Volume: 4.09M
June 14, 2021 5:16p

Mark Hulbert is a columnist for MarketWatch. His Hulbert Ratings service tracks investment newsletters that pay a flat fee to be audited.

This Story has 0 Comments
Be the first to comment
More News In

Story Conversation

Commenting FAQs »

Partner Center

About Mark Hulbert

RSS News feed

Mark Hulbert is editor of the Hulbert Financial Digest, which since 1980 has been tracking the performance of hundreds of investment advisors. The HFD...

Mark Hulbert is editor of the Hulbert Financial Digest, which since 1980 has been tracking the performance of hundreds of investment advisors. The HFD became a service of MarketWatch in April 2002. In addition to being a Senior Columnist for MarketWatch, Hulbert writes a monthly column for Barron’s.com and a column on investment strategies for the Journal of the American Association of Individual Investors. A frequent guest on television and radio shows, you may have seen Hulbert on CNBC, Wall Street Week, or ABC’s World News This Morning. Most recently, Dow Jones and MarketWatch launched a new weekly newsletter based on Hulbert's research, entitled Hulbert on Markets: What’s Working Now.

More from Mark Hulbert

  1. The S&P 500 now is top-heavy in 5 big tech stocks but that alone won’t end this bull market
  2. These 8 ‘earnings-surprise’ stocks are most compelling for investors right now
  3. Why China’s new 3-child policy won’t ease headwinds on Chinese stocks anytime soon
  4. How GameStop, AMC and other meme stocks are in control of market volatility
  5. To Roth or not to Roth?
Link to MarketWatch's Slice.