Investor Alert
Mark Hulbert

Mark Hulbert Archives | Email alerts

April 7, 2020, 6:21 p.m. EDT

These low-risk stocks have high potential in this volatile market

Low-volatility strategy hasn’t held up recently, but the bear market is young

Watchlist Relevance

Want to see how this story relates to your watchlist?

Just add items to create a watchlist now:

  • X
    S&P 500 Index (SPX)
  • X
    Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV)
  • X
    Atmos Energy Corp. (ATO)

or Cancel Already have a watchlist? Log In

By Mark Hulbert, MarketWatch

Getty Images

Low-volatility stocks aren’t supposed to fall as much as the broad market during major declines. But someone forgot to tell them that in the bear market which began in mid-February.

There’s a well-known historical pattern in which the lowest-volatility stocks have, on average, outperformed the most-volatile issues. This tendency, known as the “low volatility effect,” is directly contrary to what Finance 101 says is supposed to happen, which is that riskier stocks should produce higher returns.

One measure of the strategy’s ability to limit downside risk is its performance during past “waterfall” declines such as the U.S. market recently experienced. Prior to March, there have been five calendar months since 1980 in which the S&P 500 /zigman2/quotes/210599714/realtime SPX +0.34%  fell at least 10%. On average during those months, the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index fell by 3.6 percentage points less than the S&P 500 — 11.3% versus 14.9%.

Then came this most recent bear market, as you can see from the chart below. Since the bull market high on Feb. 19, the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index has lost 27.2%, as judged by the Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF /zigman2/quotes/201108430/composite SPLV +0.22%  , versus 26.2% for the S&P 500. Another leading low-volatility ETF — iShares Edge MSCI Minimum Volatility USA ETF /zigman2/quotes/204989507/composite ATO +1.09%   — lost 24.3% over the same period. 

Has something fundamentally changed that diminishes the low-volatility strategy’s potential? For insight, I turned to Nardin Baker, co-author (with the late Robert Haugen) of some of the seminal studies documenting the low volatility effect. Haugen was a finance professor who devoted much of his academic career to analyzing the effect; Baker is chief strategist at South Street Investment Advisors in Needham, Mass. Perhaps the best-known of those studies — Low Risk Stocks Outperform within All Observable Markets of the World — showed that the low-volatility effect existed in each of 33 different country’s stock markets over the period from 1990 through 2011.

Baker, in an email, made three observations:

1. It is unreasonable to expect any strategy to prove its worth during a short-term decline in which investors indiscriminately sell. “My experience is that over three months the price behavior rationalizes.” In other words, that’s probably the shortest period over which we should begin to even draw any conclusions. To put it another way: Check back in a couple of months.

2. The most liquid stocks were disproportionately owned by low-volatility portfolios when the bear market started. They therefore were among the first to be sold in the rush to liquidity.

3. Financial stocks were disproportionately owned by low volatility portfolios going into this bear market. As we know now, those stocks have lost a lot more than the broad market since mid-February “due to the economic stress and low rates.”

Boring can be beautiful

Might the low-volatility effect’s popularity have killed the goose that lays the golden egg? As we know from Finance 101, a strategy will stop working if too many investors start following it.

This seems unlikely as a cause of the low-volatility effect’s big losses in the current bear market. The source of that effect, according to various researchers over the years, is human nature, and to that extent we would expect it to stop working only if human nature changed.

I don’t see that happening. The all-too-human characteristic that leads to the low-volatility effect is that investors crave excitement. The stocks favored by low-volatility strategies often are boring, sometimes going for weeks or months without any major news or developments. According to this theory, low-volatility stocks therefore must offer a greater expected return in order to compensate investors for their lack of excitement.

This tendency was documented in a study that appeared a number of years ago in the Review of Financial Studies , by Brad Barber, a finance professor at the University of California, Davis, and Terrence Odean, a finance professor at the University of California, Berkeley. In the study, entitled “ All That Glitters: The Effect of Attention and News on the Buying Behavior of Individual and Institutional Investors ,” the professors document that “many investors consider purchasing only stocks that have first caught their attention.”

+11.90 +0.34%
Volume: 2.16B
Oct. 23, 2020 5:15p
US : U.S.: NYSE Arca
$ 54.79
+0.12 +0.22%
Volume: 1.65M
Oct. 23, 2020 4:00p
$ 97.69
+1.05 +1.09%
Volume: 593,402
Oct. 23, 2020 4:02p
P/E Ratio
Dividend Yield
Market Cap
$12.05 billion
Rev. per Employee
1 2
This Story has 0 Comments
Be the first to comment
More News In

Story Conversation

Commenting FAQs »

Partner Center

About Mark Hulbert

RSS News feed

Mark Hulbert is editor of the Hulbert Financial Digest, which since 1980 has been tracking the performance of hundreds of investment advisors. The HFD...

Mark Hulbert is editor of the Hulbert Financial Digest, which since 1980 has been tracking the performance of hundreds of investment advisors. The HFD became a service of MarketWatch in April 2002. In addition to being a Senior Columnist for MarketWatch, Hulbert writes a monthly column for Barron’s.com and a column on investment strategies for the Journal of the American Association of Individual Investors. A frequent guest on television and radio shows, you may have seen Hulbert on CNBC, Wall Street Week, or ABC’s World News This Morning. Most recently, Dow Jones and MarketWatch launched a new weekly newsletter based on Hulbert's research, entitled Hulbert on Markets: What’s Working Now.

More from Mark Hulbert

  1. Only two other times since George Washington was president has the U.S. stock market been as far above trend as it is now
  2. Donald Trump would want this baseball team to win the World Series
  3. How to invest in the S&P 500 without betting hard on the ‘FAAMG’ stocks that are 20% of the index
  4. How to celebrate National Retirement Security Week
  5. ‘Trump stocks’ have significantly lagged the U.S. market since 2016 — while ‘Clinton stocks’ have soared
Link to MarketWatch's Slice.