Bulletin
Investor Alert

New York Markets Close in:

Mark Hulbert

Mark Hulbert Archives | Email alerts

July 11, 2020, 2:01 p.m. EDT

This spot-on predictor of who will win the 2020 presidential election is not the stock market or even opinion polls

Online betting markets are better at forecasting the U.S. presidential election outcome

new
Watchlist Relevance
LEARN MORE

Want to see how this story relates to your watchlist?

Just add items to create a watchlist now:

  • X
    Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA)
  • X
    S&P 500 Index (SPX)

or Cancel Already have a watchlist? Log In

By Mark Hulbert, MarketWatch


Getty Images

Does the stock market predict the winner of U.S. presidential elections? Many argue that it does, pointing to the historical correlation between the incumbent party retaining the White House and the stock market’s strength in the months leading up to Election Day in November.

Given President Donald Trump’s preoccupation with the stock market, he apparently agrees. Recently he tweeted that if he’s not re-elected, investors’ 401(k)s will disintegrate and disappear — though one major Wall Street firm sees quite a different outcome for retirement savers if Trump’s presumptive challenger Joe Biden is elected.

Read: How to position your portfolio for a Joe Biden presidency

I’m not so sure about this alleged correlation between the stock market and the incumbent party’s chances of retaining the White House. Consider what I found upon analyzing the Dow Jones Industrial Average’s /zigman2/quotes/210598065/realtime DJIA +0.31%   return in every U.S. presidential election since 1900. I searched for any correlations between the Dow’s pre-election strength and whether the incumbent political party retaining the White House. I measured that strength over periods as short as the month prior, to as long as the entire year-to-date period (10+ months).

The results do not inspire statistical confidence. While some of the correlations appeared to be impressive, the majority were not significant at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a correlation is real. The lack of any consistent pattern suggests that there is less here than meets the eye, and so investors shouldn’t count out Trump’s re-election chances even if the stock market performs poorly between now and Election Day.

For example, the stock market’s year-to-date strength on Election Day is not correlated with the incumbent party’s chances. Nor is the market’s strength over the eight months leading up to the election. But, strangely, when the focus is on market strength over a period whose length is between these two — specifically, nine months rather than eight or 10 — the result in fact does become statistically significant.

Unless one can come up with a theory why market strength over a nine-month horizon should be predictive of the election outcome, but not over a slightly shorter or longer time horizon, then we should dismiss this apparent correlation.

The same inconsistency emerged when I focused on shorter time periods. The market’s return over the three months prior to the election is significantly correlated with the incumbent party’s chances—but not over the 1-month or 6-month periods prior to Election Day. This is especially important to keep in mind now since a factoid that’s making the rounds on Wall Street right now is that the stock market’s return over the three months prior to elections can predict the outcome.

Watch the betting markets

If these results aren’t enough to lead you to question the stock market’s record as an election handicapper, check out electronic betting markets such as PredictIt.org and the University of Iowa’s Iowa Electronic Markets .

These online futures markets allow users to bet on various outcomes, such as whether Trump will win re-election. The futures that trade on these sites are all-or-nothing contracts, paying 100% if the particular outcome comes to pass and nothing if it doesn’t. Accordingly, prices reflect investors’ collective bets about that outcome’s probabilities. Extensive research has found that online betting markets are better at forecasting the presidential election outcome than opinion polls.

Correlating the stock market’s gyrations with those of the Trump contract at PredictIt.org, for example, as shown in the chart above, provides insight into what investors collectively think of the president’s re-election chances. As of July 6, the PredictIt.org odds of Trump’s winning re-election are 40% — down from above 50% less than three months ago. Over those three months, in contrast, the S&P 500 /zigman2/quotes/210599714/realtime SPX +0.12%  gained 20%.

These results make it hard to argue that the stock market will decline if Trump’s odds of winning re-election sink even further.

Mark Hulbert is a regular contributor to MarketWatch. His Hulbert Ratings tracks investment newsletters that pay a flat fee to be audited. He can be reached at

More: Here’s the real reason that Mary Trump’s tell-all book matters in the presidential election

Also read: Trump, Biden fight for primacy on social media platforms

/zigman2/quotes/210598065/realtime
US : Dow Jones Global
26,748.10
+83.70 +0.31%
Volume: 211.69M
Aug. 4, 2020 1:43p
loading...
/zigman2/quotes/210599714/realtime
US : S&P US
3,298.70
+4.09 +0.12%
Volume: 1.40B
Aug. 4, 2020 1:43p
loading...

Mark Hulbert is a regular contributor to MarketWatch. His Hulbert Ratings tracks investment newsletters that pay a flat fee to be audited. He can be reached at mark@hulbertratings.com

This Story has 0 Comments
Be the first to comment
More News In
Economy & Politics

Story Conversation

Commenting FAQs »

Partner Center

About Mark Hulbert

RSS News feed

Mark Hulbert is editor of the Hulbert Financial Digest, which since 1980 has been tracking the performance of hundreds of investment advisors. The HFD...

Mark Hulbert is editor of the Hulbert Financial Digest, which since 1980 has been tracking the performance of hundreds of investment advisors. The HFD became a service of MarketWatch in April 2002. In addition to being a Senior Columnist for MarketWatch, Hulbert writes a monthly column for Barron’s.com and a column on investment strategies for the Journal of the American Association of Individual Investors. A frequent guest on television and radio shows, you may have seen Hulbert on CNBC, Wall Street Week, or ABC’s World News This Morning. Most recently, Dow Jones and MarketWatch launched a new weekly newsletter based on Hulbert's research, entitled Hulbert on Markets: What’s Working Now.

More from Mark Hulbert

  1. Beware of companies trying to sell you their stock at today’s high prices
  2. Here’s why Apple’s stock split might not be so bullish for its shares
  3. Value stocks really may have lost their mojo this time — and growth stocks are gaining from it
  4. Here’s the best way to hedge the weakening U.S. dollar and buying gold isn’t the move
  5. Why the S&P 500 may now be easier to beat and what this means for your investments

Featured Commentary »

Link to MarketWatch's Slice.