By Alex Newhouse
Since the 2020 U.S. presidential election, Parler has caught on among right-wing politicians and “influencers” — people with large online followings — as a social-media platform where they can share and promote ideas without worrying about the company blocking or flagging their posts for being dangerous or misleading.
However, the website has become a haven for far-right extremists and conspiracy theorists who are now interacting with the mainstream conservatives flocking to the platform.
As the three highest-profile social-media companies — Alphabet’s /zigman2/quotes/205453964/composite GOOG -0.23% /zigman2/quotes/202490156/composite GOOGL -0.19% YouTube, Facebook /zigman2/quotes/205064656/composite FB +2.33% and Twitter /zigman2/quotes/203180645/composite TWTR -1.33% — continue to take action to mitigate the spread of extremism and disinformation, Parler has welcomed the ensuing exodus of right-wing users. It has exploded in popularity, doubling its members to 10 million during the month of November — dwarfed, of course, by Twitter’s roughly 330 million monthly active users .
With its newfound success, the site is contributing to the widening gap between the different perceptions of reality held by a polarized public. On mainstream social media, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris won the presidential election, and theories alleging crimes by the Biden campaign and Democrats are flagged as misinformation . On Parler , Donald Trump won in a landslide, only to have his victory stolen by a wide-ranging alliance of evildoers, including Democrats and the so-called deep state.
While it’s too early to tell if Parler is here to stay, it has already achieved a reputation and engagement level that has overtaken other alternative platforms. But along with its success comes the reality that extremist movements like QAnon and the Boogalooers have thrived in the platform’s unregulated chaos.
Parler was launched in 2018 and found its place as another niche platform catering to right-wing users who ran afoul of content moderation on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. Its user base remained small — fewer than 1 million users — until early 2020.
Other primarily right-wing platforms, especially Gab , had housed fringe and violent ideologues and groups for much longer than Parler. These included violent far-right militias and the mass shooter Robert Bowers .
Parler, in contrast, gained a reputation for catering to more mainstream conservatives thanks to a handful of high-profile early adopters like Brad Parscale, Candace Owens and Sen. Mike Lee . As a result, in 2020 when Twitter began labeling misleading Trump tweets about possible fraud in absentee and mail-in voting, politicians like Ted Cruz embraced Parler as the next bastion for unfettered speech.
In the weeks before the Nov. 3 election, the big social-media sites took steps to mitigate election-related extremism and disinformation. Twitter rolled out labels for all mail-in-ballot misinformation and put a prompt on tweeted articles to encourage people to read them before retweeting. Facebook blocked QAnon groups and, later, restricted QAnon-adjacent accounts pushing the “SaveTheChildren” conspiracy theory . Facebook also began prohibiting Holocaust denial posts . YouTube labeled and blocked advertising for election-related fake information , though it left in place many conspiracy-theory-promoting videos.
These actions continued in the wake of the election, especially as mainstream conservative politicians joined Trump in pushing the false claim that Biden and the Democrats committed large-scale voter fraud to steal the election. Consequently, millions of users migrated to alternative platforms : Gab, MeWe and, in particular, Parler.
Users flocked there because of the promise of a site that wouldn’t label false information and wouldn’t ban the creation of extremist communities. But they also moved because Republican politicians and well-known elites signaled that Parler was the new home for conservatives. These include commentator Mark Levin and Fox host Sean Hannity.
Parler has only two community guidelines: It does not knowingly allow criminal activity, and it does not allow spam or bots on its platform. The absence of guidelines on hate speech has allowed racism and anti-Semitism to flourish.
My research center has spent several years building an extensive encyclopedia of far-right terminology and slang, covering niche topics from the spectrum of white supremacist, neo-fascist and anti-state movements. We have studied the ways that far-right language evolves alongside content-moderation efforts by mainstream platforms, and how slang and memes are often used to evade regulations.
We have monitored far-right communities on Parler since March and have found frequent use of both obvious white-supremacist terms and more implicit, evasive memes and slang. For example, among other explicit white-supremacist content, Parler allows usernames referencing the Atomwaffen Division’s violently anti-Semitic slogan, posts spreading the theory that Jews are descended from Satan, and hashtags such as one proclaiming that Hitler “was right.”
In addition, it is easy to find the the implicit bigotry and violence that eventually caused Facebook to ban movements like QAnon. For example, QAnon’s version of the “blood libel” theory — the centuries-old conspiracy theory that Jewish people murder Christians and use their blood for rituals — has spread widely on the platform. Thousands of posts also use QAnon hashtags and promote that conspiracy theory’s false claim that global elites are literally eating children.
Among the alternative platforms, Parler stands out because white supremacists, QAnon adherents and mainstream conservatives exist in close proximity. This results in comment threads on politicians’ posts that are a melting pot of far-right beliefs, such as a response to Donald Trump Jr.’s unfounded allegations of election crimes stating that “Civil war is the only way to drain the swamp.”