Bulletin
Investor Alert

June 10, 2015, 9:25 p.m. EDT

Oil firms put millions into fund for train blast

new
Watchlist Relevance
LEARN MORE

Want to see how this story relates to your watchlist?

Just add items to create a watchlist now:

or Cancel Already have a watchlist? Log In

By Russell Gold

Oil companies have quietly agreed to pay tens of millions of dollars into a compensation fund for deaths and damage caused by a 2013 oil-train explosion in Quebec, though the energy industry has maintained it wasn't responsible for the disaster.

Royal Dutch Shell PLC, Marathon Oil Corp., ConocoPhillips, Irving Oil Ltd. and others have contributed to a $345 million fund for victims of the accident in Lac-Mégantic, according to court filings and interviews.

If U.S. and Canadian courts approve the fund, the companies would be shielded from several lawsuits claiming wrongful death and negligence in connection with the tragedy.

Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway Ltd., the small railroad hauling the crude oil, sought bankruptcy protection soon after the accident, in which an unattended train carrying oil from North Dakota's Bakken Shale derailed and erupted into flames, killing 47.

A trustee appointed by the bankruptcy court, who has approved the compensation fund, contended in court filings that oil producers were well aware the oil they were selling was dangerously volatile and failed to take action to make transporting it safer.

Oil companies, however, have said that their responsibility ended with properly labeling the crude oil after pumping it out of the ground, which they say they did.

Bankruptcy court has become a common arena for settling complex litigation alleging negligence by multiple parties. Bankruptcy trustees, by statute, can seek a centralized settlement, including a compensation fund, to streamline the process and avoid a lengthy legal battle.

Most companies identified in court filings as participating in the proposed Lac-Mégantic settlement declined to comment. The size of their payments are generally sealed by the court, including contributions from a unit of General Electric Co. and other railcar leasing firms.

But Marathon Oil, which produced the crude involved in the Lac-Mégantic disaster, said its decision to pay into the fund wasn't an acknowledgment of liability. The Houston-based company, a big producer of oil in North Dakota, declined to disclose the sum it paid, but contributed to avoid "the time and expense associated with protracted litigation," a spokeswoman said.

She said Marathon doesn't believe it "mislabeled, misclassified or otherwise misled others regarding the characteristics of the crude oil."

In the nearly two years since the Lac-Mégantic rail disaster, there have been nearly a dozen other fiery derailments involving crude oil from North Dakota, though no fatalities.

Despite a recent decline in shipments caused by lower oil prices, nearly one million barrels a day of crude is loaded on trains every day, according to federal statistics, up from almost none before 2009.

U.S. and Canadian rail regulators have ordered railroads carrying crude oil from the Bakken Shale formation to take precautions including slowing down oil trains, and are also requiring shippers to phase in stronger tanker cars that can withstand accidents without rupturing.

Some U.S. officials, however, have complained that oil companies haven't agreed to make their crude oil safer to transport by stripping out volatile gases before putting it aboard trains. North Dakota impose some limits on such gases.

Legal experts say North Dakota oil producers should expect to face increased scrutiny in the wake of the Lac-Mégantic settlement. "In the past, railroads have been the only target in derailment cases," said David Potter, a partner with Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLP in Minneapolis. "Now you have an additional target."

Until earlier this year, it wasn't unusual for oil producers to provide train operators with generic--and often outdated--information about the physical characteristics of crude-oil cargoes, New federal rules and North Dakota law now require additional crude testing.

1 2
This Story has 0 Comments
Be the first to comment
More News In
Industries

Story Conversation

Commenting FAQs »

Partner Center

Link to MarketWatch's Slice.