Bulletin
Investor Alert

New York Markets Close in:

BookWatch Archives | Email alerts

Jan. 31, 2022, 8:27 a.m. EST

A mix of 60% stocks and 40% bonds will deliver anemic returns over the next decade — here’s how to adapt

new
Watchlist Relevance
LEARN MORE

Want to see how this story relates to your watchlist?

Just add items to create a watchlist now:

  • X
    iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR)
  • X
    SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY)
  • X
    NASDAQ 100 Index (NASDAQ Calculation) (NDX)

or Cancel Already have a watchlist? Log In

By Phil Huber

We have entered a new paradigm of anemic return expectations for traditional asset-allocation models. The prospects of a lost decade ahead are uncomfortably high for portfolios that are 60% invested in stocks and 40% in bonds – particularly when adjusted for inflation, which is at levels not seen since the early 1980s .

Investors have witnessed expensive stock markets and incredibly low interest rates. Seldom have we experienced both concurrently.

If the outlook for the 60/40 allocation is so lackluster, why do so many advisers and investors still cling to this security blanket of portfolios?

In my opinion, it’s because it hasn’t disappointed them…yet.

The appeal of a 60/40 portfolio is obvious. It has delivered diversification and solid risk-adjusted returns for decades. Its underlying components – stocks and bonds – are quite intuitive and easy to understand for most investors. Most importantly, it is incredibly easy and inexpensive to build. You can own a globally diversified 60/40 portfolio with a few clicks of a button via an ETF like the iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF /zigman2/quotes/209719687/composite AOR +0.73% .

But as user-friendly and rewarding as this portfolio has been, investors looking to rebalance their portfolios or put new cash to work are presented with unattractive trade-offs.

It has been a somewhat rough start to 2022 for the two components of 60/40 – U.S. stocks and bonds. The U.S. stock market, as measured by the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust /zigman2/quotes/209901640/composite SPY +1.63% , is down 7% year-to-date through Friday. The more growth and the tech-stock-tilted Nasdaq-100 index /zigman2/quotes/210598364/realtime NDX +1.97% , measured by the Invesco QQQ ETF /zigman2/quotes/208575548/composite QQQ +1.99% , is down nearly 12% through Friday.

While these corrections are somewhat modest, what’s worrisome to diversified investors is that bonds are down at the same time. The iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF /zigman2/quotes/200660887/composite AGG -0.44% is down 2% through Friday amid rising interest rates. This is a reminder that bonds aren’t always uncorrelated to stocks.

Fortunately, there is a growing opportunity for the average investor to harness a wider array of return streams. Adding alternative investments to the investment mix can allow investors to maintain their preferred position on the risk curve, but with less uncertainty around the tails and with a higher degree of confidence in long-term outcomes.

It may sound oxymoric, but alternative investments are becoming more mainstream. Vanguard is now in the business of private equity . Cryptocurrencies /zigman2/quotes/31322028/realtime BTCUSD +0.86% , barely a teenager, are beginning to gain traction within institutional and advisor-directed portfolios.

If history is a guide, we should expect many of today’s alternatives to become tomorrow’s diversifiers.

So if 60/40 is no longer the default answer, what is?

Investors seeking balance and using 60/40 as their baseline should generally own less of the “40,” perhaps a bit less of the “60,” and a decent amount more of “other.” But that is where the generalizations end.

There is no one-size-fits-all allocation to alternatives that makes sense for all investors. The sweet spot lies somewhere between “enough to make a difference” and “too much that investors can’t stick with it.” What’s become increasingly clear is that the only wrong answer is zero.

I built three hypothetical, index-based portfolios with varying degrees of alternatives and different investor objectives in mind. The risk and return statistics for these portfolios goes back to October 2004, which is the furthest back the index data allows. They are updated through the end of September 2021, since several of the underlying indexes use illiquid asset classes that have delayed reporting. The returns illustrated below do not represent live accounts and are designed only to provide an estimate of reasonable portfolio risk. Indices are unmanaged, do not reflect fees and expenses and are not available as direct investments.

This period covers both good times and good, including the decade-plus bull market in stocks we’ve just experienced as well as the carnage from the 2008-09 financial crisis that saw the S&P 500 /zigman2/quotes/210599714/realtime SPX +1.62% experience a peak-to-trough decline of 55%.

Stocks are represented by the MSCI All Country World Index. Bond-market performance is measured by the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index.

/zigman2/quotes/209719687/composite
US : U.S.: NYSE Arca
$ 50.00
+0.36 +0.73%
Volume: 111,831
May 17, 2022 1:46p
loading...
/zigman2/quotes/209901640/composite
US : U.S.: NYSE Arca
$ 406.61
+6.52 +1.63%
Volume: 39.13M
May 17, 2022 1:47p
loading...
/zigman2/quotes/210598364/realtime
US : U.S.: Nasdaq
12,484.51
+240.93 +1.97%
Volume: 503,949
May 17, 2022 1:47p
loading...
/zigman2/quotes/208575548/composite
US : U.S.: Nasdaq
$ 304.37
+5.93 +1.99%
Volume: 34.88M
May 17, 2022 1:47p
loading...
/zigman2/quotes/200660887/composite
US : U.S.: NYSE Arca
$ 102.29
-0.45 -0.44%
Volume: 3.47M
May 17, 2022 1:47p
loading...
/zigman2/quotes/31322028/realtime
US : CoinDesk
30,138.35
+257.90 +0.86%
Volume: 0.00
May 17, 2022 1:47p
loading...
/zigman2/quotes/210599714/realtime
US : S&P US
4,073.10
+65.09 +1.62%
Volume: 1.31B
May 17, 2022 1:47p
loading...
1 2
This Story has 0 Comments
Be the first to comment
More News In
Investing

Story Conversation

Commenting FAQs »

Partner Center

Link to MarketWatch's Slice.