Investor Alert
Mark Hulbert

Mark Hulbert Archives | Email alerts

March 27, 2021, 10:59 a.m. EDT

Why ARK Innovation’s red-hot returns aren’t as impressive as they seem

Watchlist Relevance

Want to see how this story relates to your watchlist?

Just add items to create a watchlist now:

  • X
    ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK)
  • X
    Invesco QQQ Trust Series I (QQQ)
  • X
    NASDAQ 100 Index (NASDAQ Calculation) (NDX)

or Cancel Already have a watchlist? Log In

By Mark Hulbert

You could have performed as well as the high-flying ARK Innovation ETF by investing in the Nasdaq 100 Index.

I know that seems hard to believe, given the stunning performance chief investment officer Cathie Wood has produced with ARK Innovation /zigman2/quotes/204808965/composite ARKK +4.86% — a 229% gain over the past year, according to FactSet. Meanwhile, the Invesco QQQ Trust /zigman2/quotes/208575548/composite QQQ +2.21% (which is benchmarked to the Nasdaq 100 /zigman2/quotes/210598364/realtime NDX +2.17% ), gained 78%. Since its creation in October 2014, ARK Innovation has produced an annualized gain of 34.6%, versus 20.6% for the QQQ.

At the same time, ARK Innovation has been extremely volatile and risky, making an apples-to-apples comparison with the Nasdaq 100 misleading. As measured by the standard deviation of monthly returns, ARK Innovation has been 73% more volatile than QQQ. That’s really saying something, since QQQ is itself more volatile than broad market indices such as the S&P 500 /zigman2/quotes/210599714/realtime SPX +1.49% .

One approach statisticians use to create an apples-to-apples comparison is with a metric known as the Sharpe Ratio, invented by William Sharpe, the 1990 Nobel laureate in economics. It is the ratio of a fund’s average returns to the standard deviation of those returns. The Sharpe Ratio of ARK Innovation’s monthly returns since 2014 is almost precisely the same as the QQQ’s.

If you’re like some of my clients, your reaction is not to care about the Sharpe Ratio. “You can’t take the Sharpe Ratio to the bank,” you in effect tell me. It’s raw performance that counts, and on that basis there’s no doubt that the ARKK did far better.

This reaction is confused, however. In fact you can take the Sharpe Ratio to the bank. If you had been willing to incur the ARK Innovation’s increased volatility, you could have made just as much by leveraging an investment in the QQQ. That is, you would have made just as much by increasing your portfolio allocation to QQQ, or by buying it on sufficient margin. This is illustrated in the chart below:

The Sharpe Ratio is not the only method that statisticians employ for measuring adviser performance on a level playing field, but other widely used approaches reach the same conclusion. Perhaps the best known, at least in academic circles, is the Fama-French factor model, named for University of Chicago finance professor Eugene Fama (the 2013 Nobel laureate in economics) and Dartmouth College professor Ken French. Their model involves an econometric test to see if a mutual fund’s return is significantly better than a combination of index funds benchmarked to factors such as small-cap, growth, and momentum.

The answer for ARK Innovation is “no” — an overweight allocation to a small-cap growth fund would have produced the same overall return since November 2014. 

Luck versus skill

Note carefully that these statistical tests do not prove that ARK Innovation’s performance is due solely to luck. Instead, those tests tell us that we cannot conclude that its performance was not due to luck. In this case, the double negative is not the same as the positive; this is a subtle, but important, difference.

This goes to show just how difficult it is to prove that an investment manager has genuine market-beating ability. If beating an index fund by more than 10 percentage points annualized over a 6-plus-year period is not enough, then what is? (An email to ARK Investment Management requesting comment was not immediately answered.)

The answer: Satisfying traditional standards of statistical significance requires beating the market by a larger amount over a much longer period.

An example of a fund that does jump over this much-higher hurdle is Renaissance Technologies’ Medallion Fund, a hedge fund that has produced an incredible 39% annualized return over the 33 calendar years through 2020, versus “just” 11% annualized for an index fund. Bradford Cornell, an emeritus finance professor at UCLA, told me in an interview that it is impossible to attribute that fund’s outperformance to mere luck. (Unfortunately, this fund is only available to current and former partners at Renaissance Technologies.)

In the meantime, it’s too early to render anything close to a final verdict on ARK Innovation’s stunning performance. Its performance over the next several years may prove to be good enough to eventually satisfy traditional standards of statistical significance. Until then we can’t be sure. This is yet another reason why index funds are the default investment of choice. 

Mark Hulbert is a regular contributor to MarketWatch. His Hulbert Ratings tracks investment newsletters that pay a flat fee to be audited. He can be reached at

More: Cathie Wood’s new Tesla price target is out. And it’s a doozy .

Plus: ARK’s Cathie Wood disrupted investment management. She’s not done yet .

US : U.S.: NYSE Arca
$ 104.31
+4.83 +4.86%
Volume: 20.57M
May 14, 2021 4:00p
US : U.S.: Nasdaq
$ 326.39
+7.05 +2.21%
Volume: 44.37M
May 14, 2021 4:00p
US : U.S.: Nasdaq
+283.97 +2.17%
Volume: 568,749
May 14, 2021 5:16p
+61.35 +1.49%
Volume: 1.91B
May 14, 2021 5:02p

Get news alerts on ARK Innovation ETF — or create your own.
This Story has 0 Comments
Be the first to comment
More News In

Story Conversation

Commenting FAQs »

Partner Center

About Mark Hulbert

RSS News feed

Mark Hulbert is editor of the Hulbert Financial Digest, which since 1980 has been tracking the performance of hundreds of investment advisors. The HFD...

Mark Hulbert is editor of the Hulbert Financial Digest, which since 1980 has been tracking the performance of hundreds of investment advisors. The HFD became a service of MarketWatch in April 2002. In addition to being a Senior Columnist for MarketWatch, Hulbert writes a monthly column for Barron’s.com and a column on investment strategies for the Journal of the American Association of Individual Investors. A frequent guest on television and radio shows, you may have seen Hulbert on CNBC, Wall Street Week, or ABC’s World News This Morning. Most recently, Dow Jones and MarketWatch launched a new weekly newsletter based on Hulbert's research, entitled Hulbert on Markets: What’s Working Now.

More from Mark Hulbert

  1. Why any stock market rally right now will be quick
  2. These are the 30 value stocks that top investment newsletters like best right now
  3. How retirees should respond to this week’s inflation news
  4. Wall Street’s ‘Big Lie’: Performance claims that are increasingly straining credulity
  5. Why you should worry about the flood of new cash into U.S. stock funds
Link to MarketWatch's Slice.