Bulletin
Investor Alert

June 23, 2021, 9:58 p.m. EDT

Supreme Court decision could help advance Biden’s housing agenda — starting with the firing of the FHFA director

new
Watchlist Relevance
LEARN MORE

Want to see how this story relates to your watchlist?

Just add items to create a watchlist now:

  • X
    Fannie Mae (FNMA)
  • X
    Freddie Mac (FMCC)

or Cancel Already have a watchlist? Log In

Jacob Passy

Changes are quickly coming to the regulatory body that oversees mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, thanks to a decision released Wednesday by the U.S. Supreme Court.

In a decision written by Justice Samuel Alito that included many of the court’s nine justices dissenting on certain points, the Supreme Court ruled that the structure of the Federal Housing Finance Agency was unconstitutional. The decision allowed President Joe Biden to fire the agency’s current director, Mark Calabria, who was appointed by former President Donald Trump and had served as chief economist for then-Vice President Mike Pence.

Wednesday night, the White House appointed Sandra Thompson, the FHFA’s deputy director, as its acting chief until a permanent director is confirmed.

The FHFA was created in 2008 in the wake of the subprime mortgage crisis as part of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act, and the FHFA quickly thereafter placed Fannie and Freddie into conservatorship. The case before the Supreme Court was brought by Fannie Mae /zigman2/quotes/208846331/composite FNMA -1.56% and Freddie Mac /zigman2/quotes/202741363/composite FMCC -0.89% shareholders who argued that the regulator overstepped its authority when it reached an agreement with the Treasury Department to sweep the mortgage giants’ profits to the federal government.

The profit sweeps began in 2012 to repay the funds used to bail Fannie and Freddie out.

Read more: ‘The biggest proposal we’ve seen in a long time’: How Biden’s $2.3 trillion infrastructure plan will invest in America’s housing

The case largely mirrored one the Supreme Court decided in 2020 where the court ruled in a 5-4 decision  that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s structure was unconstitutional. Like the CFPB, the FHFA has a single director, who is appointed by a president for a five-year term. Until now, the FHFA’s director could not be removed by a subsequent president.

The Supreme Court’s decision in the FHFA case, formally called Collins v. Yellen, was criticized by some in the financial services industry, as the widely-held expectation is that Biden will seek to fire Calabria.

“We’re disappointed in today’s decision as it removes political independence from an entity that affects the entire financial services marketplace,” said Jim Nussle, CEO and president of the Credit Union National Association. “Stability at the FHFA is vital to the stability of the entire secondary mortgage market.”

Biden will take a different approach to housing finance

Under Calabria’s leadership, the FHFA was focused on seeking an end to the conservatorships of Fannie and Freddie and recapitalizing the enterprises that specialize in securitizing mortgages. There were rumors this past winter that Calabria and the Trump administration were seeking to fast-track privatizing Fannie and Freddie. Some called the plan risky, though, saying that it could disrupt the nation’s housing market.

Whoever Biden appoints to permanently fill Calabria’s role is unlikely to maintain that same approach. Prior to the presidential election, Beacon Policy Advisors partner Brandon Barford said that Biden was likely to use the FHFA as “a tool to help with racial justice and economic inequality,” which would represent a return to the approach taken under the Obama administration.

Since Biden took office, his administration has worked to reinstate policies and regulations focused on promoting fair housing that were eliminated under Trump.

“I don’t think there’s any desire to have [Fannie and Freddie] be released under a Biden administration, or necessarily to have them hold higher capital, because that makes the pool they have to purchase mortgages smaller,” Barford told MarketWatch last October.

Others previously suggested that Biden could attempt to go a step further and see Fannie and Freddie recast as utilities, a plan that some argue could reduce the risk the two enterprises pose to taxpayers. The utility model has been endorsed by some powerful lobbying groups, including the National Association of Realtors .

/zigman2/quotes/208846331/composite
US : U.S.: OTC
$ 1.26
-0.02 -1.56%
Volume: 3.14M
July 30, 2021 3:59p
P/E Ratio
129.90
Dividend Yield
N/A
Market Cap
$1.46 billion
Rev. per Employee
$14.21M
loading...
/zigman2/quotes/202741363/composite
US : U.S.: OTC
$ 1.11
-0.01 -0.89%
Volume: 2.42M
July 30, 2021 3:59p
P/E Ratio
4.17
Dividend Yield
N/A
Market Cap
$721.57 million
Rev. per Employee
$9.94M
loading...

Get news alerts on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — or create your own.
This Story has 0 Comments
Be the first to comment
More News In
Economy & Politics

Story Conversation

Commenting FAQs »

Partner Center

Link to MarketWatch's Slice.